|
It is a common assumption among buyers that once a contract is signed, the hard part is done. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. In practice, finance issues can still arise after a buyer has signed a contract, and when they do, the consequences can be serious. Delays, missed deadlines, disputes between the parties and, in some cases, loss of deposit or default under the contract are all very real possibilities. This is one of the reasons it is so important for buyers to understand what sort of finance approval they actually have before they commit themselves to a purchase. Not all approvals are the same
Many buyers use the term “pre-approval” as though it means the bank is ready to lend. Often, it does not. A pre-approval can be a useful early step. It may help a buyer understand their price range and may identify obvious issues at the outset. However, in many cases it is still subject to conditions. Those conditions can include satisfactory verification of income, confirmation of liabilities, an acceptable valuation, or the lender being satisfied with the property itself. That means a buyer can feel “approved” and still run into trouble later. Formal approval is generally a much stronger position because it usually follows the lender’s fuller assessment of both the borrower and the property. Even then, timing and contract obligations still matter. If the contract is subject to finance Where a contract includes a finance clause, that clause gives the buyer some protection if finance cannot be obtained in time. However, buyers should not assume that the clause is unlimited or automatic. Finance clauses usually operate within strict timeframes. They also often require the buyer to take reasonable steps to obtain approval and to communicate within the contractual dates. If a buyer waits too long, misunderstands the type of approval they have, or allows finance issues to drift beyond the finance date, the protection they thought existed may not help in the way they expected. This is where misunderstandings about pre-approval can become costly. A buyer may enter a contract believing they are in a safe position, only to discover that the lender still needs more information, the valuation is short, or the loan structure no longer fits the borrower’s circumstances. If the contract is at auction Auction contracts are a very different proposition. In many cases, buying at auction means there is no finance clause to fall back on after the hammer falls. The buyer is committed immediately and must settle in accordance with the contract. That makes the quality of the buyer’s finance preparation especially important. A pre-approval may still be useful before auction, but buyers should understand what it does and does not cover. If the lender has not fully assessed the borrower’s position, if the valuation has not been addressed, or if there are unresolved credit issues, a pre-approval alone may not be enough to remove risk. For auction buyers, it is especially important to understand whether they are genuinely ready to proceed, rather than simply hopeful that finance will work itself out later. Common reasons finance can fall over after signing There are a number of reasons finance can fail after contract, even where a buyer has had positive signs early in the process. Some of the more common examples include:
We also regularly see buyers underestimate the impact of changing their loan strategy mid-stream. For example, refinancing existing debt, consolidate liabilities, rely on equity from another property, or reshape the purchase strategy after signing can all create additional complications if the timing is not managed carefully. Good preparation is not just about the bank One of the best ways to reduce risk is to make sure the legal and finance sides of the transaction are working together from the outset. Buyers are often best served when their solicitor and broker are both involved early and both understand the important dates, risks and assumptions behind the deal. That may mean:
For buyers who already own property, this can be particularly important. A purchase may not just depend on a new loan application. It may also depend on how an existing loan is structured, whether equity is being relied upon, or whether there is a need for a prior review of the borrower’s overall lending position. In those cases, taking the time to get a proper review of your current mortgage before signing can help uncover issues earlier rather than under pressure halfway through the contract. Similarly, where a buyer’s plans involve renovations, improvements, or a broader investment strategy, it can help to sort out the intended funding pathway early — including whether accessing equity for renovations or future plans is part of the overall structure — rather than trying to resolve those questions after contractual obligations have already begun. The takeaway Signing a contract is not the same thing as having guaranteed finance. Whether a buyer is purchasing under a finance clause or bidding at auction, understanding the difference between pre-approval and formal approval can make a significant difference to the level of risk involved. Good property transactions usually depend on both legal and financial preparation. When buyers understand their true finance position, and when their solicitor and broker are aligned before key deadlines arise, there is a much better chance of avoiding unnecessary stress and unpleasant surprises. Written by Go Mortgage
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Categories |